Thread 'Let's talk politics'

Message boards : The Lounge : Let's talk politics
Message board moderation

To post messages, you must log in.

Previous · 1 . . . 22 · 23 · 24 · 25

AuthorMessage
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3356
United Kingdom
Message 119470 - Posted: 23 Jun 2026, 6:43:03 UTC

And now (in UK) the news fills with waffle about whether Labour should have a leadership contest or not.
ID: 119470 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Volunteer moderator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15949
Netherlands
Message 119472 - Posted: 23 Jun 2026, 11:17:47 UTC - in response to Message 119470.  

How about new elections?
ID: 119472 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3356
United Kingdom
Message 119473 - Posted: 23 Jun 2026, 14:35:18 UTC - in response to Message 119472.  

How about new elections?
Why would Labour call new elections when they are likely to do badly? I know Reform and some Tories are calling for them, but there is no constitutional requirement to call one. I think Labour will claim the precedent of the Tories changing leaders four or five times without calling an election gives them a little leeway.

I suspect at the last general election, the Tories were pleased to lose because they knew whoever won would have to deal with the mess they left and thought one term wasn't enough time to turn things around meaning Labour would then at the end of five years, get all the blame.

(That doesn't mean there isn't a lot I think Labour could have done a lot better!)
ID: 119473 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Volunteer moderator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15949
Netherlands
Message 119481 - Posted: 24 Jun 2026, 12:21:11 UTC - in response to Message 119473.  

In reply to Dave's message of 23 Jun 2026:
I think Labour will claim the precedent of the Tories changing leaders four or five times without calling an election gives them a little leeway.
True, but Labour were calling out the Tories each and every time then and saying they wanted general elections. So now that they're in that same boat, they should do what they demanded, right?
ID: 119481 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3356
United Kingdom
Message 119482 - Posted: 24 Jun 2026, 12:24:41 UTC - in response to Message 119481.  

I agree they should. I will be extremely surprised if they do. The only real reason they should is their calls for the Tories to do the same. There is no constitutional reason for them to do so.
ID: 119482 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Volunteer moderator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15949
Netherlands
Message 119493 - Posted: 25 Jun 2026, 16:14:24 UTC

https://londonlovesbusiness.com/councils-order-homeowners-to-remove-air-con-as-temperatures-hit-40c/
https://www.thesun.co.uk/money/39541505/councils-order-homeowners-rip-air-con/

Planning officers from councils have ordered some residents to remove the air conditioning units over fears they emit too much carbon dioxide and should only be used as a last resort, The Telegraph has reported. Its net zero crackdown comes as part of building regulations that state that “active cooling”, such as using an air con unit, should only be used after all “passive methods” such as opening the window have been exhausted.
I have all my windows closed, as it's 36C outside, and 'just' 27 inside. These planners are crazy. Opening a window will make it worse inside. And how does aircon emit CO2? The electricity it consumes may be from a power plant that uses fossil fuel to burn and emit CO2, but the system itself doesn't. Are these planners idiots?
ID: 119493 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3356
United Kingdom
Message 119494 - Posted: 25 Jun 2026, 18:04:30 UTC - in response to Message 119493.  

Are these planners idiots?
Yes. The law does not support their actions. Sadly, some of these people do not have the money to challenge these court decisions.
ID: 119494 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileGary Charpentier
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 23 Feb 08
Posts: 2579
United States
Message 119497 - Posted: 26 Jun 2026, 0:59:30 UTC - in response to Message 119493.  

In reply to Jord's message of 25 Jun 2026:
Are these planners idiots?

Look at the demographics of who is more likely to pass from heat related illness. Now who do those people tend to vote for? Is there a connection?
ID: 119497 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileDave
Help desk expert

Send message
Joined: 28 Jun 10
Posts: 3356
United Kingdom
Message 119498 - Posted: 26 Jun 2026, 3:57:08 UTC - in response to Message 119497.  

In reply to Gary Charpentier's message of 26 Jun 2026:
In reply to Jord's message of 25 Jun 2026:
Are these planners idiots?

Look at the demographics of who is more likely to pass from heat related illness. Now who do those people tend to vote for? Is there a connection?

The planners are not politicians however. Some areas they are civil servants, others such as Cambridge, planning is outsourced to a private company.
ID: 119498 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
ProfileJord
Volunteer moderator
Help desk expert
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 05
Posts: 15949
Netherlands
Message 119499 - Posted: 26 Jun 2026, 5:22:39 UTC

😂😂😂 Now we'll never know.

London climate change event on adapting to extreme heat has been cancelled due to extreme heat
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3vyz6w5z0zo
ID: 119499 · Report as offensive     Reply Quote
Previous · 1 . . . 22 · 23 · 24 · 25

Message boards : The Lounge : Let's talk politics

Copyright © 2026 University of California.
Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation.