/edit ... mods ... please move this to the web interface message board ... thnx

When I look at the CPU Host breakdown, my CPU type is listed twice. If both sets of data are actually for the same CPU, I think the listings should be merged into one.

I sorted the CPU Host breakdown list (for SETI) by the CPU field and copied data records 302 and 311 below.

302 AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ 1,588 8,817,331.84 18,019.96 5,552.48 11.35

311 AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ 1,646 8,199,554.22 17,150.98 4,981.50 10.42

AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ is spelled exactly the same in each entry.

Does anyone know why there would be two listings for one CPU type?

I wonder whether one should say 2400 and the other 2400+. Could you post a link to the page which I've never seen?

---

I tried to attach a link to the page in question but I get an error when I try to open it ... Parse error: syntax error, unexpected '<' in /home/boincstats/includes/deeplinks.php on line 18

I will try again later.

Basically I was viewing my SETI statistics and noticed a CPU Host Breakdown link on the left. I followed that link and looked for my CPU type by filtering the list by CPU type and scrolling down.

MY CPU is an AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ ... and there are two listings for this exact text string

here is the link mo.v

http://www.boincstats.com/stats/host_cpu_stats.php?pr=sah&st=300&or=0

Thanks, I've looked at the list of Semprons and see that in fact almost the whole list is repeated:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
301 AMD Sempron(tm) 2200+ 1,241 7,344,125.18 16,065.55 5,917.91 12.95
302 AMD Sempron(tm) 2300+ 387 2,383,547.45 5,397.61 6,159.04 13.95
303 AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ 1,596 8,877,610.28 17,345.26 5,562.41 10.87
304 AMD Sempron(tm) 2500+ 939 4,982,040.41 9,468.32 5,305.69 10.08
305 AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ 1,336 7,236,032.33 11,114.02 5,416.19 8.32
306 AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ 1,499 10,293,129.22 21,626.79 6,866.66 14.43
307 AMD Sempron(tm) 3000+ 1,692 10,901,897.04 24,913.58 6,443.20 14.72
308 AMD Sempron(tm) 3300+ 10 77,865.28 214.94 7,786.53 21.49
309 AMD Sempron(tm) 2000+ 6 48,239.75 107.38 8,039.96 17.90
310 AMD Sempron(tm) 2200+ 1,430 6,305,893.69 14,310.71 4,409.72 10.01
311 AMD Sempron(tm) 2300+ 460 2,207,207.77 4,600.03 4,798.28 10.00
312 AMD Sempron(tm) 2400+ 1,656 8,251,059.82 16,588.62 4,982.52 10.02
313 AMD Sempron(tm) 2500+ 727 3,913,755.46 7,898.67 5,383.43 10.86
314 AMD Sempron(tm) 2600+ 1,359 5,187,994.92 10,267.73 3,817.51 7.56
315 AMD Sempron(tm) 2800+ 1,198 6,499,179.46 11,808.14 5,425.02 9.86
316 AMD Sempron(tm) 3000+ 520 2,620,382.95 5,823.09 5,039.20 11.20
317 AMD Sempron(tm) 3200+ 42 116,030.77 446.02 2,762.64 10.62
318 AMD Sempron(tm) 3300+
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
which makes me think that there must be 2 production series with some significant difference. But I've no idea what, sorry.

---

Maybe it's the processor stepping or cache size, there are several different versions of the A64 3800+ for example (one single core, one dualcore). But perhaps it's a boinc-stats issue rather than a boinc issue (try registering and asking in their shoutbox).

---

Thanks gents

I appreciate your responses ... I'll try a post over at BOINC stats and do some reading on the development cycle of the Sempron processors.